[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"facets":3,"$f2svgtchh935z":209,"$fml2rf7qae5xq":283,"$f23tnbge0ap2xa":342,"$f2knw909oznjzm":417},{"demo":4,"categories":5,"cities":120,"total":168,"types":169},false,[6,11,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85,90,95,100,105,110,115],{"count":7,"icon":8,"slug":9,"title":10},274,"lucide:tractor","agriculture-agro-industrie","Agriculture \u002F Agro-industrie",{"count":12,"icon":8,"slug":13,"title":14},0,"agriculture-elevage","Agriculture \u002F Élevage",{"count":16,"icon":17,"slug":18,"title":19},75,"lucide:palette","art-arts-graphiques","Art \u002F Arts graphiques",{"count":21,"icon":22,"slug":23,"title":24},1350,"lucide:megaphone","commercial-marketing-vente","Commercial \u002F Marketing \u002F Vente",{"count":26,"icon":27,"slug":28,"title":29},170,"lucide:newspaper","communication-journalisme","Communication \u002F Journalisme",{"count":31,"icon":32,"slug":33,"title":34},1248,"lucide:calculator","comptabilite-finances-assurance","Comptabilité \u002F Finances \u002F Assurance",{"count":36,"icon":37,"slug":38,"title":39},196,"lucide:scale","droit-fiscalite","Droit \u002F Fiscalité",{"count":41,"icon":42,"slug":43,"title":44},132,"lucide:zap","electricite-electronique","Électricité \u002F Électronique",{"count":46,"icon":47,"slug":48,"title":49},40,"lucide:scissors","esthetique-coiffure-couture","Esthétique \u002F Coiffure \u002F Couture",{"count":51,"icon":52,"slug":53,"title":54},37,"lucide:landmark","fonction-publique","Fonction publique",{"count":56,"icon":57,"slug":58,"title":59},253,"lucide:graduation-cap","formation-education","Formation \u002F Éducation",{"count":61,"icon":62,"slug":63,"title":64},258,"lucide:hard-hat","genie-civil","Génie civil",{"count":66,"icon":67,"slug":68,"title":69},839,"lucide:users","gestion-management-rh","Gestion \u002F Management \u002F RH",{"count":71,"icon":72,"slug":73,"title":74},263,"lucide:utensils","hotellerie-restauration-tourisme","Hôtellerie \u002F Restauration \u002F Tourisme",{"count":76,"icon":77,"slug":78,"title":79},737,"lucide:laptop","informatique-internet-telecoms","Informatique \u002F Internet \u002F Télécoms",{"count":81,"icon":82,"slug":83,"title":84},218,"lucide:wrench","mecanique-electromecanique","Mécanique \u002F Électromécanique",{"count":86,"icon":87,"slug":88,"title":89},86,"lucide:house","menage-services-domestiques","Ménage \u002F Services domestiques",{"count":91,"icon":92,"slug":93,"title":94},567,"lucide:heart-pulse","sante-environnement-foret","Santé \u002F Environnement \u002F Forêt",{"count":96,"icon":97,"slug":98,"title":99},244,"lucide:clipboard-list","secretariat-assistance","Secrétariat \u002F Assistance",{"count":101,"icon":102,"slug":103,"title":104},69,"lucide:shield","securite","Sécurité",{"count":106,"icon":107,"slug":108,"title":109},13,"lucide:languages","edition-traduction","Édition \u002F Traduction",{"count":111,"icon":112,"slug":113,"title":114},623,"lucide:truck","transport-logistique","Transport \u002F Logistique",{"count":116,"icon":117,"slug":118,"title":119},26,"lucide:brain","sociologie-psychologie","Sociologie \u002F Psychologie",[121,125,129,133,137,140,144,148,152,156,160,164],{"count":122,"slug":123,"title":124},1224,"national","National",{"count":126,"slug":127,"title":128},3207,"douala-littoral","Douala et Région du Littoral",{"count":130,"slug":131,"title":132},2294,"yaounde-centre","Yaoundé et Région du Centre",{"count":134,"slug":135,"title":136},115,"bafoussam-ouest","Bafoussam et Région de l'Ouest",{"count":101,"slug":138,"title":139},"bamenda-nord-ouest","Bamenda et Région du Nord-Ouest",{"count":141,"slug":142,"title":143},77,"buea-sud-ouest","Buéa et Région du Sud-Ouest",{"count":145,"slug":146,"title":147},98,"bertoua-est","Bertoua et Région de l'Est",{"count":149,"slug":150,"title":151},179,"ebolowa-sud","Ebolowa et Région du Sud",{"count":153,"slug":154,"title":155},52,"ngaoundere-adamaoua","Ngaoundéré et Région de l'Adamaoua",{"count":157,"slug":158,"title":159},97,"garoua-nord","Garoua et Région du Nord",{"count":161,"slug":162,"title":163},197,"maroua-extreme-nord","Maroua et Région de l'Extrême-Nord",{"count":165,"slug":166,"title":167},129,"international","International",7738,[170,174,178,182,186,190,194,198,202,205],{"count":171,"slug":172,"title":173},6158,"temps-complet","Temps complet",{"count":175,"slug":176,"title":177},88,"temps-partiel","Temps partiel",{"count":179,"slug":180,"title":181},247,"temporaire","Temporaire",{"count":183,"slug":184,"title":185},93,"freelance","Freelance",{"count":187,"slug":188,"title":189},595,"stage","Stage",{"count":191,"slug":192,"title":193},9,"spontane","Candidature spontanée",{"count":195,"slug":196,"title":197},391,"appel-d-offres","Appel d'offres",{"count":199,"slug":200,"title":201},127,"consultance","Consultance",{"count":191,"slug":203,"title":204},"formation-payante","Formation payante",{"count":206,"slug":207,"title":208},21,"autres","Autres",{"_id":210,"applyEmail":211,"applyInstructions":211,"applyOnline":4,"applyUrl":211,"attachments":211,"category":212,"city":213,"company":214,"deadline":211,"description":218,"excerpt":276,"featured":4,"number":277,"publishedAt":278,"salary":279,"slug":280,"title":281,"type":282},"job-legacy-42532",null,{"icon":92,"slug":93,"title":94},{"slug":123,"title":124},{"about":215,"cover":211,"documents":211,"logo":216,"name":217,"video":211,"website":211},"Action contre la faim est une organisation à but non lucratif créée en 1979 par un groupe d'intellectuels comprenant notamment Alfred Kastler, Bernard-Henri Lévy, Jacques Attali, Françoise Giroud, Marek Halter et Jean-Christophe Victor","https:\u002F\u002Fpub-7a6771395b29454e90953cec49e21f01.r2.dev\u002Flogo\u002Flegacy-e-16161\u002Flegacy-1634048995-logo-acf-2017.jpg","ACF ACTION CONTRE LA FAIM - ONG Internationale,  Cameroun",[219,230],{"_key":220,"_type":221,"children":222,"markDefs":228,"style":229},"l2zy8","block",[223],{"_key":224,"_type":225,"marks":226,"text":227},"l2zy9","span",[],"CRISIS RESPONSE WITH THE FOCUS ON FOOD SECURITY, WASH INTERVENTIONS, AND HEALTH CARE IN WEST AND CENTRAL AFRICA\nFUNDED BY [GFFO]",[],"h2",{"_key":231,"_type":221,"children":232,"markDefs":274,"style":275},"l2zya",[233,238,242,246,250,254,258,262,266,270],{"_key":234,"_type":225,"marks":235,"text":237},"l2zyb",[236],"strong","SUMMARY TABLE",{"_key":239,"_type":225,"marks":240,"text":241},"l2zyc",[],"\nCountry Office Name Cameroon\nContract Number M2C\nGFFO reference number: PF-2Team2-321.50\u002FAFR\u002FREG\u002FAcF\u002F2023\u002F01\nPartners (if applicable) Health Districts\nLocation (country\u002Fies, region\u002Fs) Cameroon\nProject title Rapid response to basic needs and nutrition security for populations affected by the crisis in West & Central Africa.\nSector(s) Health and Nutrition (HN); Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS)\nDuration 3 Years\nStarting Date July 2023\nEnding Date June 2026\nDonor GFFO\nEvaluation Type External Final Evaluation\nEvaluation Dates 29 May 2026 to 30 July 2026\n\n",{"_key":243,"_type":225,"marks":244,"text":245},"l2zyd",[236],"TABLE OF CONTENTS",{"_key":247,"_type":225,"marks":248,"text":249},"l2zye",[],"\n\nACRONYMS 3\n1. PROJECT BACKGROUND 4\n2. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES OF THE EVALUATION 6\n3. EVALUATION SCOPE 10\n4. EVALUATION APPROACH AND QUESTIONS 10\n• EVALUATION CRITERIA TABLE 11\n5. METHODOLOGY 12\n• QUANTITATIVE COMPONENT – HOUSEHOLD SURVEY (INCLUDING FMSNA) 13\n• QUALITATIVE COMPONENT – FGDS, KIIS, OBSERVATIONS 14\n• IMPORTANT METHODOLOGICAL DISTINCTION 14\n• FLEXIBILITY AND ADAPTATION 14\n6. KEY DELIVERABLES 15\n7. MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS AND WORKPLAN 16\n• TENTATIVE WORKPLAN 17\n8. PROFILE OF THE EVALUATOR 17\n9. LOGISTIC AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS 18\n10. CONSTITUTION OF THE TENDER 18\n11. LEGAL AND ETHICAL MATTERS 19\n12. ANNEX 19\n\n\nACRONYMS\nACF Action Contre la Faim\nAAP Accountability to Affected Populations\nCMAM Community-based Management of Acute Malnutrition\nICCM+ Integrated Community Case Management Plus\nDAC Development Assistance Committee (OECD)\nFCS Food Consumption Score\nFGDs Focus Group Discussions\nFMSNA Focused Multi-Sectoral Needs Assessment (led by ACF)\nFSL Food Security and Livelihoods\nGBV Gender-Based Violence\nGFFO German Federal Foreign Office\nHDDS Household Dietary Diversity Score\nHHS Household Hunger Scale\nHN Health and Nutrition\nIDPs Internally Displaced Persons\nKIIs Key Informant Interviews\nLCSI Livelihood Coping Strategy Index\nM&E Monitoring and Evaluation\nMEAL Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability and Learning\nMHPSS Mental Health and Psychosocial Support\nMSNA Multi-Sectoral Needs Assessment (IOM\u002FCHINGO)\nNGO Non-Governmental Organization\nOECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development\nPLW Pregnant and Lactating Women\nRCSI Reduced Coping Strategy Index\nRRM Rapid Response Mechanism\nSAM Severe Acute Malnutrition\nToR Terms of Reference\nUN United Nations\nWASH Water, Sanitation and Hygiene\n",{"_key":251,"_type":225,"marks":252,"text":253},"l2zyf",[236],"1. PROJECT BACKGROUND",{"_key":255,"_type":225,"marks":256,"text":257},"l2zyg",[],"\n",{"_key":259,"_type":225,"marks":260,"text":261},"l2zyh",[236],"1.1 Project Objectives",{"_key":263,"_type":225,"marks":264,"text":265},"l2zyi",[],"\nObjective of the project The objective of the project is to contribute to the reduction of morbidity and mortality and improved well-being for crisis-affected populations.\nExpected outcomes and indicators The outcomes of the planned project are as follows:\nOutcome 1: To improve access to basic shelter, water, sanitation and hygiene, and nutrition & health services through life-saving rapid response programs for displaced populations.\n Ind 1: % of target population with adequate WASH services and hygiene practices. Target: 20% improvement.\n Ind 2: % of beneficiaries (disaggregated by sex, age and diversity) reporting that humanitarian assistance is delivered in a safe, accessible and participatory manner. Target: >80%.\n Ind 3: Recovery rate of SAM Case Management. Target: >75%.\n Ind 4:% of targeted population reporting access to safe health services at mobile clinics and health facilities. Target: 75%.\n\nOutcome 2: To improve nutrition security of crisis-affected populations and resilience to future shocks through community-based approaches.\n Ind 1: of households that reduced their rCSI score after intervention. Target: 70%.\n Ind 2: % of targeted population benefiting from mental health activities show an improvement in their well-being by the end of the intervention. Target: 85%.\n Ind 3: % of households reducing their Household Hunger Scale (HHS) between the beginning and end of the intervention. Target: 70%.\nMain activities implemented The project aims to improve access to emergency shelter, water, sanitation and hygiene, and nutrition and health services, and to increase overall food security for vulnerable populations in acute crises and shocks through emergency life-saving programs. ACF participates in national rapid response mechanisms (RRMs) in all four countries. The integration of specific emergency health, WASH, food, and nutrition interventions into the joint RRM framework is based on existing needs that are not being met by RRM interventions in targeted areas. The proposed interventions will enable the provision of a full package of services to displaced and host populations and broaden the range of assistance to crisis-affected populations to reduce the need for humanitarian assistance and improve the resilience of populations to future shocks through community-based approaches.\n1. Improving access to emergency shelter, water, sanitation and hygiene, and nutrition and health services through life-saving emergency assistance programs for displaced people\nImproving access to emergency shelter, WASH facilities, and nutrition and health services through life-saving emergency assistance programs for displaced populations.\nIn Nigeria, approximately 5,000 people will benefit from emergency water supply through water trucking by installing storage tanks\u002Fbladders with standpipes for users in formal and informal camps. Approximately 20,000 people recently displaced or affected by communicable diseases\u002Ffloods will benefit from rapid rehabilitation of existing water supplies. Only in rare, severe cases where water needs are very high and there is no other alternative, will ACF provide safe water by truck with an appropriate exit strategy. Similarly, emergency sanitation services will be provided through the construction of gender-specific emergency latrines, rehabilitation\u002Frepair\u002Fsludging of existing latrines. ACF will train a gender-balanced group of community volunteers to work with project staff to facilitate access to female beneficiaries. Recently displaced IDPs, returnees, and host communities from formal or informal IDP camps will be targeted through the distribution of gender-sensitive hygiene kits, shelter kits, and NFI kits as recommended in the RRM strategy.\nRapid response to nutritional, health, and mental health emergencies for displacement affected populations and vulnerable host communities through mobile clinics and in health facilities\nIn Chad and Cameroon, specific emergency health and nutrition interventions will be implemented alongside the joint Rapid Response Mechanism (RRM) framework, as the needs in the targeted areas are not covered by RRM interventions. The proposed interventions will enable the provision of a full package of services to the displaced and host populations with mobile clinics. Through these mobile clinics and support to health facilities, the project will also improve the coverage of primary health care needs for the host population. In addition, the project will support health facilities in implementing Phase 1 of the National Health Coverage Strategy through a model of performance-based financing for supported health facilities in maternal, newborn, and infant health services. In addition, donations of drugs and medical supplies, monitoring and supervision of drug management, joint epidemic preparedness and response workshops, and epidemiological surveillance training will be provided. Patients who show signs of severe malnutrition when treated by community health workers are referred to the health center, and patients who show signs of severe malnutrition when treated by mobile clinics are referred to the district hospital. SAM- children (severe acute malnutrition) and their caregivers receive treatment kits and instructions on how to use them.\n2. Improving the food security of crisis-affected populations and resilience to future shocks through community-based approaches.\nCommunity-based approaches to treating simple childhood illnesses, prevention, and health and nutrition surveillance are strengthened in affected populations.\nIn Cameroon, the project will strengthen ACF's ongoing community-based management of acute malnutrition (CMAM) together with integrated community-based case management for malnutrition (ICCM+), ensuring continuity of the current AA-funded pilot. Based on the need assessment and implementation by partners, ICCM+ will be expanded to new health areas. In the health areas currently funded by the AA, lessons learned will be shared with the health district, ensuring the provision of resources by national agencies.\nPeople affected by the crisis receive high-quality psychological and psychosocial care and improve their well-being\nIn Cameroon, ACF will partner with the RRM team to implement MHPSS interventions for emotional stabilization and psychological resource strengthening, delivered in groups for children over 6 (girls and boys) and adults (men and women), with a special focus on pregnant and lactating women (PLW). Domestic violence has continued to increase dramatically, according to GBVIMS. To reduce this vulnerability among the population, ACF plans to establish psychosocial support groups targeting children, adolescents, women, and men.\nIn the Central African Republic, ACF will provide tailored psychological support to communities affected by the shock. The proposed intervention aims to address needs not covered by the Rapid Response Mechanism (RRM). It is primarily intended to complement the activities of the Rapid Response Mechanism by addressing the mental health and psychosocial needs of crisis-affected communities.\nMeeting the immediate food and recovery needs of people affected by the crisis.\nIn Chad, ACF will implement emergency food assistance activities (mainly during the lean season), complemented by a package of activities to support early livelihood recovery for communities regularly affected by displacement, insecurity, and climate shocks. In the Central African Republic, food assistance and early livelihood recovery interventions are being implemented in response to the unstable situation by distributing agricultural inputs to households affected by the shocks. The proposed intervention aims to address needs not covered by the Rapid Response Mechanism (RRM), which currently only provides support in the form of household essential items and WASH. However, under this new project, ACF intends to support communities that are in dire need of food but do not have the meet the usual criteria of the RRM.\n\nThe project logframe is attached in Annex I.\n\n• An external final evaluation of the previous GFFO-funded project “Multisectoral Emergency Response in Shelter, Nutrition and Health, and Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH), for populations affected by crises in the Lake Chad Basin in Cameroon and Nigeria was conducted in 2023. A report is available.\n\n1.2 Project Current Status\nThe project is currently in its final phase of implementation, approaching closure in June 2026. Overall, implementation has progressed in line with initial planning, although some delays have been observed due to security constraints, access limitations to certain areas, and operational challenges related to logistics and coordination across multiple countries. Some activities, particularly those relying on community-based approaches (such as iCCM+ and MHPSS interventions), experienced localized delays in scale-up due to capacity constraints and contextual factors. However, these delays were partially mitigated through adaptive management measures.\n\nSeveral outputs have been successfully achieved or are on track to be achieved before the end of the project, particularly in terms of service delivery (health, nutrition, WASH) and emergency response interventions. Minor adjustments have been made to implementation modalities in response to contextual changes (e.g. access constraints, population movements), while the overall objectives of the project have remained unchanged.\n\n2. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES OF THE EVALUATION\n2.1 Rationale for the Evaluation\n\nThis evaluation is conducted at the end of the project to assess its overall performance, results, and added value. It aimed to provide an opportunity to inform decision-making for future programming cycles and affected populations, local partners, ACF teams, and the donor (GFFO).\n\nThe evaluation is also driven by a dual objective of accountability and learning. On the one hand, it aims to provide credible, independent, and evidence-based findings on the extent to which the project has achieved its intended objectives. On the other hand, it seeks to capture lessons learned and identify good practices that can inform the design and implementation of future emergency and resilience interventions in the targeted sectors.\n\nIn addition, the evaluation will include a complementary objective related to the implementation of a targeted ACF- led Focused Multi-Sectoral Assessment (FMSNA). The aim of this assessment is to identify critical gaps and vulnerabilities within the most vulnerable IDP, returnee, and host community populations, with a specific focus on hard-to-reach areas and zones most impacted by the ongoing crisis. This will provide specialized data on ACF’s core sectors to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the crisis's multi-dimensional impact in the most affected communities, and enrich the external evaluation.\nTo minimize duplication of efforts and reduce survey fatigue among affected populations, the FMSNA will be carefully designed to be geographically and thematically complementary to the existing assessments, prioritizing underserved\u002FCrisis areas and key information gaps.\n2.2 Objectives of the Evaluation\nThe main objective of the evaluation is to assess the overall performance of the project against its intended outcomes and outputs, using the OECD DAC evaluation criteria.\n\nSpecifically, the evaluation aims to:\nAssess the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability, and coherence of the intervention;\nAnalyze the quality and appropriateness of the integrated multi-sectoral approach\nIdentify key achievements, challenges, and factors influencing performance\nAssess cross-cutting issues including gender, disability, protection, inclusion of vulnerable groups, and accountability to affected populations\nProvide actionable and evidence-based recommendations for future programming\nDeliver credible, rigorous, and operationally useful findings that can directly inform decision-making and improve future interventions.\nIn addition, the evaluation will include a complementary objective regarding the FMSNA:\nGenerate updated, gap-focused and sector-specific data through a targeted Focused Multi-Sectoral Assessment, in order to strengthen the evidence base on remaining needs for stakeholder advocacy and ACF ‘s strategic planning.\nThe FMSNA component will be fully aligned with the evaluation design and integrated within the overall data collection strategy.\nSector\n(FMSNA - Far North) Key domains of analysis Indicative data collection methods\nWASH Access to water (including barriers); hygiene knowledge and practices; sanitation; gender roles in water collection Household survey, FGDs\nHEALTH Access to and use of health services (including barriers); vaccination; main health issues; coping strategies Household survey, KIIs\nNUTRITION Infant and young child feeding practices (including breastfeeding); access to nutrition services; dietary diversity (PLW and children) Household survey\nFOOD SECURITY & LIVELIHOODS Food access constraints; FCS, HDDS; Food and Livelihood coping strategies (rCSI, LCSI) Household survey\nMENTAL HEALTH & PROTECTION Safety and security concerns; access to services for people with disabilities; perceived well-being FGDs, KIIs, self-reporting tools\nDISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT AND ANTICIPATORY ACTIONS\nKey risks and shocks affecting affected populations\nCommunity knowledge, access to, and trust in local early warning, anticipatory action, and crisis response mechanisms HH Survey, KIIs\n\nThe above domains are indicative and may be refined by the evaluator during the inception phase, based on data availability, complementarity with assessment reports, and identified preliminary priority information gaps.\n\n2.3 Use and users of the Evaluation\nThe External final evaluation findings will be used for multiple purposes:\nInstrumental use:\n To inform the design of future programmes and potential scale-up of successful approaches\n To adjust strategic orientations in emergency response and resilience programming.\n\nProcess use:\n To strengthen internal reflection, learning processes, and programme quality improvement across sectors covered\n To improve MEAL practices and adaptive management approaches.\n\nConceptual use:\n To deepen understanding of integrated approaches (health, nutrition, and MHPSS) in emergency contexts like the intervention zones in Cameroon\n To contribute to organizational and sectoral knowledge.\n\nThe main users of the evaluation include:\n ACF country office teams (programme, MEAL, coordination)\n ACF headquarters technical advisors and ACF Germany\n Donor (GFFO);\n Local authorities and partners.\n\nUsers will be involved through participation in key stages of the evaluation process, including validation of the methodology, participation in data collection (KIIs), and feedback on draft findings.\n\n2.4 Dissemination plan\nThe dissemination of evaluation findings aims to promote learning, support accountability, and inform decision-making. Findings will be shared internally and externally through appropriate channels and formats to maximize uptake and use.\n\nAudience Objective Tools used for dissemination Forum Who will be in charge? Timeline\nIdentify who will be interested in the evaluation final product? Who needs to be informed about the main findings? What do we expect from sharing the main evaluation findings? Share information? Contribution to knowledge? Creating changes? Actions? I.e. report sharing, briefings, meetings, articles, presentations, and discussion, etc. Do we identify existing forums (i.e. country office coordination meetings) that could be used to disseminate the findings? Who is responsible for ensuring the dissemination? When will the dissemination happen?\nACF Country Team Improve programme quality and decision-making Presentation, full report Coordination meetings\nDedicated Meeting MEAL Coordinator\nEvaluation lead After validation\nACF HQ and ACF Germany Inform global learning and strategy Executive summary, report Technical meetings\nDedicated Meeting Evaluation lead After validation\nDonor (GFFO) Accountability and reporting Final report, summary Formal submission Country Director\u002FDeputy Country Director As per ACF Germany and Donor deadline\nLocal authorities Share key findings and recommendations Summary report Online sharing\u002F Physical transmission Field Coordinator\u002F Deputy Field Coordinator After validation of Country Director\nPartners (Local health authorities) Strengthen collaboration and learning Summary report Online sharing \u002F Physical transmission Field Coordinator\u002F Country Director After validation of Country Director\n\n\n\n3. EVALUATION SCOPE\n3.1. Elements covered by the evaluation\nThe evaluation will cover the entire project implemented in Cameroon, with a focus on intervention areas in Mayo Sava, Mayo Tsanaga, and Mayo Danay. The primary level of analysis for statistically significant findings will be the overall project level. Findings may be further disaggregated at sub-national level (per health district\u002For health area) to provide contextual insights, although such disaggregation will remain indicative due to sample size limitations.\n\nAll technical sectors will be included: Health, Nutrition, and MHPSS. The evaluation will assess the full results chain, including inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes. Attention will be given to key approaches such as mobile clinics, community-based approaches, and integrated service delivery.\n\nThe evaluation will include both direct beneficiaries and relevant stakeholders (community members, local authorities, and health partners).\n\nIn addition, the evaluation will draw on secondary data from the partners assessments reports and will integrate a complementary Focused Multi-Sectoral Assessment (FMSNA) to fill identified sectoral and geographic gaps. These elements will contribute to strengthening the overall evidence base and ensuring a comprehensive understanding of needs, outcomes, and contextual factors.\n\n3.2. Cross-cutting issues\nThe evaluation will systematically assess cross-cutting issues in line with ACF policies, including:\nGender equality and women’s empowerment\nProtection and GBV risk mitigation\nInclusion of persons with disabilities and vulnerable groups\nAccountability to affected populations (AAP), including feedback and complaints mechanisms;\nConflict sensitivity and “Do No Harm” principles\nEnvironmental considerations where relevant.\n4. EVALUATION APPROACH AND QUESTIONS\nThe evaluation will be guided by OECD DAC criteria (relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability, and coherence).\nCriteria Assessment Assessment questions\ncoherence Assess in which measure the project intervention was aligned with the needs and priorities of affected populations and local health system. Were targeting and design appropriate? Was intervention adapted to context changes?\nAssess whether the project is compatible with existing ones, as well as with international and national policies and strategies, to ensure overall coherence, optimize synergies, and minimize duplication.\nRelevance Assesses whether the intervention is aligned with local priorities and needs (as well as with national and local health policies, thereby increasing ownership, accountability and cost-effectiveness).\nEfficiency Assess the extent to which resources\u002Finputs (funds, expertise, time, etc.) are cost-effectively converted into results. Were activities implemented in a timely and cost-effective manner? How efficient were delivery mechanisms?\nEffectiveness Assess the extent to which the objectives of the interventions have been achieved, considering their relative importance and demonstrating the effectiveness of the approach adopted by ACF. What factors enabled or hindered achievement? How effective were integrated approaches?\nAssess whether the interventions address the need to reach key population groups whose lives are at risk, wherever they may be\nSustainability and impact Assesses whether the benefits of the project are likely to endure after the withdrawal of donor funding and the official cessation of activities. The first signs of positive and negative effects, primary and secondary, in the short, medium or long term, produced by this intervention, whether directly or indirectly, intentionally or unintentionally\nAn additional perspective to consider\nContribution Analysis and Explanatory Mechanisms What change mechanisms contributed to the achievement or non-achievement of the expected results?\nWhat contextual, institutional, operational, or security-related factors influenced the observed outcomes and effects?\nTo what extent can the observed changes reasonably be attributed to the intervention, considering the influence of external factors?\nLearning What strategic lessons can be drawn from the implementation of this intervention to inform the design and implementation of future similar programmes?\nWhich approaches, practices, or implementation modalities proved most effective and should be replicated, adapted, or scaled up?\nWhat key challenges and innovations emerged during implementation, and how can they inform future humanitarian programming?\n\nEVALUATION CRITERIA TABLE\nThe evaluation will adopt a qualitative assessment approach structured around the OECD DAC criteria. Instead of assigning numerical scores, the evaluator will provide an evidence-based analysis for each criterion. A summary matrix will be included in the report (in the executive summary and\u002For main body), presenting the following elements for each evaluation criterion:\nCriteria Key Findings Strengths Limitations \u002F Challenges Supporting Evidence Implications \u002F Recommendations\nCoherence\nRelevance\nEfficiency\nEffectiveness\nSustainability & Impact\nAccountability (cross-cutting criteria)\n\nNota bene: The evaluator may adapt the evaluation criteria and questions, but any fundamental changes should be agreed between the ACF team and the evaluator and reflected in the inception report.\n\n5. METHODOLOGY\n5.1 Data Collection methodology\nThis evaluation will adopt a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative data from both primary and secondary sources. The collected data will be structured and analyzed in alignment with the specific evaluation criteria established for this mandate. In accordance with professional ethical standards, the methodology transversally integrates equity and gender considerations (this includes disaggregation of data by Sex, Age, and Disability), Attention will be paid to gender-segregated focus groups where appropriate. This approach ensures full and safe participation of women, marginalized groups.\nTo ensure the robustness of the findings, data collection could be structured around five core pillars:\nDesk Review: An in-depth analysis of project framework documents, including action plans, progress\u002Fachievement reports, and monitoring and evaluation (M&E) data (Baseline; satisfaction survey; feedback days reports; Logframe follow-up; Activities progress reports; etc.). Findings from the 2023 final evaluation of the previous GFFO-funded project “Multisectoral Emergency Response in Shelter, Nutrition and Health, and Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH), for populations affected by crises in the Lake Chad Basin in Cameroon and Nigeria” should be taken into account. Relevant outputs from the last MSNA database will be included as part of the desk review and secondary data analysis.\nSemi-Structured Interviews: In-depth individual interviews with key stakeholders, including ACF (ACF) implementation teams, as well as institutional and technical partners.\nFocus Group Discussions (FGDs): Targeted group discussions with direct, indirect, and non-beneficiaries, as well as community leaders and representatives of internally displaced persons (IDPs).\nDirect Observation and quantitative Household survey: Field visits to villages, communities, and IDP sites to contextualize project achievements in the ground. The profiles sought for the household surveys will be those identified at the start of the project: displaced persons, people living far from community health centres; vulnerable people; etc. Where relevant, the household survey tools will incorporate selected modules aligned with the FMSNA to capture priority indicators not covered by existing datasets.\nPrimary field data will be enriched and cross-referenced through institutional and sector-specific interviews with:\nLocal Authorities and Community Leaders: Village chiefs, and IDP representatives; Local health authorities.\nHumanitarian Actors: ACF program coordination and base teams, Sectoral Cluster Leads (specifically Health and Nutrition).\nState Technical Services in charge of public health; social affairs or women and family.\nTo guarantee the validity and reliability of the conclusions, a double triangulation strategy will be applied:\nTriangulation of Sources: Cross-examining the perspectives of direct beneficiaries against those of key informants and institutional stakeholders.\nTriangulation of Methods: Comparing quantitative data (household surveys or available data) with qualitative findings (focus groups and direct observations).\nParticular attention will be paid to ensuring complementarity of primary data collection expected (including the FMSNA), minimizing respondent burden. The FMSNA component will therefore remain targeted, focusing on priority information gaps and, where possible, different geographic areas. The FMSNA is not intended to generate fully representative results at sub-national level but to complement evaluation findings with targeted, operationally relevant data across ACF sectors of intervention.\nThe implementation of this methodology is subject to external constraints that will require mitigation:\nPotential unavailability of certain target groups or institutional officials.\nGeographical or security access constraints in reaching specific direct and indirect beneficiary groups (the survey could rely exclusively on qualitative data collection).\nThe risk of non-response or reluctance to participate from certain key stakeholders.\n5.2. Sampling\nTo ensure both robustness and depth of analysis, the evaluation will adopt a mixed sampling strategy, clearly distinguishing between quantitative and qualitative data collection methods.\nQuantitative component – Household Survey (including FMSNA)\nThe household survey, including modules related to the FMSNA, will follow a probability-based sampling approach. This approach aims to:\n ensure the statistical robustness and credibility of quantitative findings\n allow for valid inference at the overall project level\n generate reliable data on key outcome indicators, beneficiary perceptions, and sectoral needs.\n\nA multi-stage cluster sampling strategy (or equivalent probability-based method) will be applied, depending on feasibility and updated sampling frames. The final sample size and clustering approach will be mutually agreed during the inception phase, taking into account:\n population size and distribution\n planned level of precision and confidence\n operational constraints (access, security, time).\nThe FMSNA component will be fully integrated within the household survey, using selected modules to capture priority indicators not sufficiently covered by existing datasets. The sampling design will ensure that:\n data collection remains complementary to ongoing assessments\n duplication of efforts is minimized\n coverage prioritizes relevant intervention areas and key information gaps.\nQualitative component – FGDs, KIIs, Observations\nQualitative data collection will follow a purposive sampling approach, designed to capture diverse perspectives, experiences, and contextual insights.\nThis includes:\n Focus Group Discussions (FGDs)\n Key Informant Interviews (KIIs)\n Direct observations.\n\nParticipants will be selected based on their relevance to the evaluation objectives, ensuring inclusion of different population groups and stakeholder categories.\n\nHomogeneous group composition will be applied for FGDs (e.g., by gender, age, or displacement status), in order to:\n create safe and non-intimidating environments\n ensure participation of women and vulnerable groups\n improve data quality and depth of discussion.\nImportant methodological distinction\nThe evaluation design explicitly distinguishes between:\n Probability-based sampling for the household survey (quantitative) to ensure statistical validity\n Purposive sampling for qualitative components, aimed at generating in-depth and context-rich insights.\nThis distinction ensures methodological rigor and avoids ambiguity between analytical purposes and levels of inference.\nFlexibility and adaptation\nThe evaluator is expected to refine and validate the sampling strategy in the inception report, including:\n sample sizes and allocation\n cluster selection and geographic coverage\n integration of FMSNA modules within the quantitative survey.\nAdjustments may be made based on:\n security and access constraints\n availability of communities and stakeholders\n complementarity with MSNA coverage.\nNote: The evaluator is expected to adjust, refine, and formalize the final sample sizes, targets, methodologies and geographic clusters within the Inception Report based on available project information, security and access constraints as well as security and access constraints.\n5.3 Selection and Inclusion Criteria\nTo ensure validity and avoid arbitrary bias, the evaluator will apply a structured set of selection criteria:\n Vulnerability & Demographic Status: Proportional inclusion of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), host communities, female-headed households, and persons with specific vulnerabilities (elderly, disabled).\n Level of Exposure to Project Benefits: Categorization of respondents based on the type of assistance received (e.g., direct beneficiaries of Project Intervention vs. indirect beneficiaries).\n Geographic Variation: Selection of intervention sites based on operational realities—contrasting easily accessible\u002Fperi-urban sites with remote, hard-to-reach, or highly conflict-affected communities.\n5.4 Sampling Matrix and Scenarios\n\nData Collection Tool Sampling Approach Key Purpose Target \u002F Inclusion Criteria\nHousehold Survey (incl. FMSNA modules) Probability-based (cluster sampling or equivalent) Generate statistically robust quantitative data at project level Households in intervention areas; focus on vulnerable groups (IDPs, host communities, etc.)\nFocus Group Discussions (FGDs) Purposive sampling Capture perceptions, experiences, and community dynamics Homogeneous groups (gender, age, displacement status); beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries\nKey Informant Interviews (KIIs) Expert purposive sampling Gather institutional, technical, and operational insights ACF staff, local authorities, cluster leads, technical partners\nObservations Criterion-based sampling Contextual understanding of implementation and service delivery Selected sites reflecting different operational realities\n\n5.4 Risk Mitigation: Convenience vs. Purposive Scenarios\n Best-Case Scenario (Strict Purposive Sampling): The consultant will work with ACF program lists beforehand to identify and invite specific profiles (e.g., \"MHPSS beneficiaries; SAM children guardian; Pregnant women who benefit from ANC; Breastfeeding mothers who benefited from PNC; CHW; Health personnel; etc.\"). This ensures high-quality, targeted data.\n Worst-Case Scenario (Convenience & Snowball Sampling): In the event of sudden insecurity, road closures, or low community availability, teams will pivot to convenience sampling (interviewing accessible individuals at health centers supported or in a safe place). To mitigate bias, snowball sampling will be used—asking initial respondents to point out less visible or more marginalized neighbors to ensure the evaluation does not only hear from the most vocal community members.\nInception Report Expectation: The evaluator must review ACF’s actual field data and security constraints during the inception phase. The final Inception Report will define the exact number of planned surveys, FGDs, and KIIs per location based on this purposive framework.\n6. KEY DELIVERABLES\nThe following are the evaluation deliverables the evaluator will deliver to ACF:\n\nDeliverables Provisional Deadlines\nInception Report (including the evaluation questions mapping tool) 28 June 2026\nDraft Evaluation Report 13 July 2026\nFinal Evaluation Report 23 July 2026\nEvaluation restitution 28 July 2026\n\nAll outputs must be submitted both in English and French and follow the format shared by ACF.\n\nA steering committee will be set up to ensure rigorous follow-up and validation of this activity. Its composition is as follows:\n\nMember of Steering Committee Function Comments\nMEAL Coordinator (Evaluation Lead) Lead of the survey Overall coordination of the evaluation process ensures methodological quality and compliance with ACF MEAL standards on evaluation.\nLiaises with the consultant, collect all the feedback, and pass it on to the consultant.\nMEAL Manager Technical Field support Provides operational guidance, support the consultant in accordance with the methodology and key deliverables, share M&E relevant project data\nProjects Manager Program coordination Organize with support departments the consultants field Mission, facilitates access to field teams and local stakeholders, review reports\nSectoral Heads of Departments Technical inputs Provide sector-specific expertise and contribute to the validation data collection tools, findings and recommendations\nField Coordinator\u002F Deputy Field Coordinator\nDeputy country Director\u002F Country Director Global Coordination Ensures that the activity is effectively implemented, approves the final deliverables and ensures that the evaluation results are disseminated both internally and externally\n\nThe quality of the deliverables will be assessed by, discussed with and approved by the Steering Committee, with the strong participation of technical referents at HQ and ROWCA level.\n7. MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS AND WORKPLAN\nThe evaluator will directly report to the evaluation lead.\nThe evaluator will submit all the evaluation outputs directly and only to the evaluation lead. The evaluation lead will forward a copy to the steering committee for comments\u002Ffeedback\u002Freview. The evaluation lead will consolidate the comments and send these to the evaluator by date agreed between the steering committee and the evaluator or as soon as the comments are received from the steering committee.\nThe evaluator will consider all comments to finalize deliverables and will submit it to the evaluation lead for a second review. If the steering committee still has comments\u002Ffeedback, others back and forth will be done. Then, the evaluation lead will share the final version of the report with the steering committee and relevant stakeholders (according to the dissemination plan).\nTentative Workplan\nActivities Evaluator Working Days Dates\nDesign of the ToRs and evaluation questions mapping 3 Days 29 May 2026\nSet up of the steering committee and identification of the evaluation lead 2 Days 2 June 2026\nIdentification of the evaluator 10 Days 19 June 2026\nDrafting and signing of the contract with the selected evaluator 4 Days 23 June 2026\nEvaluator briefing (at Maroua Base) 0,5 Day 24 June 2026\nDesk review and prepare Inception Report Min. 4 Days 28 June 2026\nData collection Min. 10 Days 29 June- 8 July 2026\nDraft Report and Processed database Min. 5 Days 13 July 2026\nBack and forth between the consultant and ACF country office team Min. 7 Days 17 July\nReport finalization and validation by ACF Country and HQ Teams Min. 3 Days 23 July 2026\nRestitution meeting 0.5 Days 28 July 2026\nMin Total of days (without double counting days): 44 Days\n\n8. PROFILE OF THE EVALUATOR\nThe consultant should be an individual or a moral person. The principal background requested is:\nDiplomas: at least Master level in Monitoring and Evaluation, social sciences; rural sociology; public health; project evaluation; a specialization in health, nutrition, anthropology or psychosocial field is an asset.\n\nExperience and assets: at least 2 years of experience in the provision of similar services with a good knowledge of the intervention zone and the Country health system. Experience in assessment of health projects in Cameroon or African context is a major asset. Added value if experience in evaluating GFFO-funded projects.\n\nFluent in French and English is an asset, both writing and speaking is mandatory. Knowledge of local language is an asset.\n\nGood communications skills and experience of workshop facilitation;\nAbility to write clear and useful reports (may be required to produce examples of previous work);\nUnderstanding of donor requirements;\nAbility to manage the available time and resources and to work to tight deadlines;\nIndependence from the parties involved.\n\n9. LOGISTIC AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS\nThe consultant must comply with the principles of ACF as mentioned in the \"Procurement Policies\"; with the security rules and its ethical code of data protection and safeguarding. The consultant evaluator will receive a security briefing from dedicated ACF staff upon arrival in Yaounde and Maroua base.\n\n10. CONSTITUTION OF THE TENDER\nThe tender file must consist of a technical and financial offer detailed as follows:\n\nThe technical bid will briefly present (70%):\nBrief description of the understanding of the terms of reference (10%)\nReview and\u002F or inputs of the Methodology and approaches proposed for this survey (25%)\nWork plan including a provisional timetable (15%)\nBrief presentation of the consultant and, if applicable, his\u002Fher collaborators with their professional experience (Curriculum Vitae attached and university degrees)\nReferences with proof of delivery and acceptance of the work in target project area would be an advantage (20%).\n\nThe financial and administrative offer will present (30%):\nFor financial offer:\nDetails of the cost of the consultant's fees\nDetails of the consultant's per diem and travel costs\nVarious costs to produce working documents and reports as well as communication requirements and the proposed payment terms if applicable.\n\nFor administrative component (Consultants\u002Fservice providers who submit incomplete or outdated documents will be disqualified if not completed within 48 hours of the relevant notification):\nTax compliance certificate (up to date)\nRegistration certificate (with taxpayer number)\nLocation map\nBank details\nTrade register.\n\nNB: the consultant will directly cover all support costs related to data collection (including payment of enumerators recruited by the consultant, vehicle rental, allowances for local guides and facilitators, as well as per diem and accommodation for ACF staff involved in data collection in the supported health areas).\nThe consultant will be responsible for covering all travel costs from his\u002Fher place of residence to Maroua and return, as well as all personal living expenses during the field mission. The financial proposal submitted by the consultant must therefore include costs related to national travel to Maroua, living expenses, professional fees, logistics costs (data collectors; car renting; etc.) and any other costs necessary for the proper implementation of the assignment within the defined timeframe.\n\nThe offers shall be transmitted, in electronic version with the subject \"Administrative, Technical and Financial Offer-External Final Evaluation-ACF 2026\" at the latest on 17th June 2026 to the following address: appel-offre@cm-actioncontrelafaim.org\n\n\n",{"_key":267,"_type":225,"marks":268,"text":269},"l2zyj",[236],"11. LEGAL AND ETHICAL MATTERS",{"_key":271,"_type":225,"marks":272,"text":273},"l2zyk",[],"\nThe ownership of the draft and final documentation belongs to ACF. ACF is to be the main addressee of the evaluation, and its results might impact both operational and technical strategies. ACF is likely to share the results of the evaluation with the following groups:\n• Donor(s)\n• Governmental partners\n• Various coordination bodies\n\nThe consultant selected will not have any links to project management, or any other conflict of interest that would interfere with the independence of the evaluation.\n\n",[],"normal","CRISIS RESPONSE WITH THE FOCUS ON FOOD SECURITY, WASH INTERVENTIONS, AND HEALTH CARE IN WEST AND CENTRAL AFRICA FUNDED BY [GFFO] SUMMARY TABLE Country Office Name Cameroon Contract Number M2C GFFO ref",42532,"2026-06-10T12:13:17.000Z","À négocier","call-for-tenders-external-final-evaluation-gffo-project-42532","Call for Tenders :  EXTERNAL FINAL EVALUATION, GFFO Project",{"slug":196,"title":197},{"items":284,"total":339,"page":340,"pageSize":341},[285,300,313,326],{"_id":286,"category":287,"city":288,"company":289,"deadline":293,"featured":294,"number":295,"publishedAt":296,"salary":211,"slug":297,"title":298,"type":299},"job-50023",{"icon":92,"slug":93,"title":94},{"slug":131,"title":132},{"logo":290,"name":291,"website":292},"https:\u002F\u002Fpub-7a6771395b29454e90953cec49e21f01.r2.dev\u002Flogo\u002Flegacy-e-8610\u002Flegacy-1578415801-egpaf-logo-good.jpg","EGPAF Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation - Cameroun","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.pedaids.org","2026-11-15T22:59:00Z",true,50023,"2026-11-05T01:21:25.483Z","04-nouveaux-postes-ouverts-50023","04 Nouveaux Postes Ouverts",{"slug":180,"title":181},{"_id":301,"category":302,"city":303,"company":304,"deadline":211,"featured":294,"number":308,"publishedAt":309,"salary":279,"slug":310,"title":311,"type":312},"job-legacy-45570",{"icon":92,"slug":93,"title":94},{"slug":131,"title":132},{"logo":305,"name":306,"website":307},"https:\u002F\u002Fpub-7a6771395b29454e90953cec49e21f01.r2.dev\u002Flogo\u002Flegacy-c-515\u002Flegacy-1699877057-emplois-jobs-recrutement-cameroun-heada.jpg","ONG HEADA CAMEROON","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.heada.org\u002F",45570,"2026-10-27T07:32:50.000Z","job-opportunity-technical-manager-clinical-45570","Job opportunity: TECHNICAL MANAGER \u002F CLINICAL",{"slug":172,"title":173},{"_id":314,"category":315,"city":316,"company":317,"deadline":211,"featured":294,"number":321,"publishedAt":322,"salary":279,"slug":323,"title":324,"type":325},"job-legacy-45509",{"icon":92,"slug":93,"title":94},{"slug":131,"title":132},{"logo":318,"name":319,"website":320},"https:\u002F\u002Fpub-7a6771395b29454e90953cec49e21f01.r2.dev\u002Flogo\u002Flegacy-e-7493\u002Flegacy-1606320103-emplois-jobs-recrutement-cameroun-affirmative.jpg","AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, ONG - Cameroun","https:\u002F\u002Faffirmativeact.org",45509,"2026-10-25T07:31:49.000Z","avis-de-recrutement-medecin-projets-posiapud-et-phoenix-45509","Avis de recrutement : MEDECIN,  Projets POSIAPUD ET PHOENIX",{"slug":180,"title":181},{"_id":327,"category":328,"city":329,"company":330,"deadline":211,"featured":294,"number":334,"publishedAt":335,"salary":279,"slug":336,"title":337,"type":338},"job-legacy-29845",{"icon":92,"slug":93,"title":94},{"slug":123,"title":124},{"logo":331,"name":332,"website":333},"https:\u002F\u002Fpub-7a6771395b29454e90953cec49e21f01.r2.dev\u002Flogo\u002Flegacy-e-153\u002Flegacy-1475259723-cameroun-offres-emplois-imc.jpg","IMC International Medical Corps, ONG CAMEROUN","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.internationalmedicalcorps.org.uk",29845,"2026-10-09T08:18:23.000Z","avis-de-recrutement-04-postes-a-pourvoir-ong-urgent-29845","Avis de recrutement : 04 Postes à pourvoir - ONG URGENT",{"slug":172,"title":173},4,1,7,{"items":343,"total":91,"page":340,"pageSize":341},[344,349,361,371,382,393,404],{"_id":286,"category":345,"city":346,"company":347,"deadline":293,"featured":294,"number":295,"publishedAt":296,"salary":211,"slug":297,"title":298,"type":348},{"icon":92,"slug":93,"title":94},{"slug":131,"title":132},{"logo":290,"name":291,"website":292},{"slug":180,"title":181},{"_id":350,"category":351,"city":352,"company":353,"deadline":211,"featured":4,"number":356,"publishedAt":357,"salary":211,"slug":358,"title":359,"type":360},"job-50019",{"icon":92,"slug":93,"title":94},{"slug":166,"title":167},{"logo":211,"name":354,"website":355},"ACREST","https:\u002F\u002Fcleantechcam.com\u002Ffr\u002Fjobs",50019,"2026-11-05T00:56:26.195Z","consultant-carbone-mrv-cuisson-propre-verra-vcs-vm0050-a-distance-50019","Consultant Carbone & MRV — Cuisson propre (Verra VCS \u002F VM0050), à distance",{"slug":200,"title":201},{"_id":362,"category":363,"city":364,"company":365,"deadline":293,"featured":4,"number":366,"publishedAt":367,"salary":211,"slug":368,"title":369,"type":370},"job-50006",{"icon":92,"slug":93,"title":94},{"slug":131,"title":132},{"logo":290,"name":291,"website":292},50006,"2026-11-05T00:53:10.575Z","clinical-doctor-site-project-coordinator-obala-50006","Clinical Doctor, Site Project Coordinator, Obala",{"slug":180,"title":181},{"_id":372,"category":373,"city":374,"company":375,"deadline":376,"featured":4,"number":377,"publishedAt":378,"salary":211,"slug":379,"title":380,"type":381},"job-50007",{"icon":92,"slug":93,"title":94},{"slug":146,"title":147},{"logo":290,"name":291,"website":292},"2026-11-11T22:59:00Z",50007,"2026-11-05T00:52:10.575Z","nurse-site-project-coordinator-garoua-boulai-50007","Nurse, Site Project Coordinator, Garoua-Boulaï",{"slug":180,"title":181},{"_id":383,"category":384,"city":385,"company":386,"deadline":387,"featured":4,"number":388,"publishedAt":389,"salary":211,"slug":390,"title":391,"type":392},"job-50009",{"icon":92,"slug":93,"title":94},{"slug":131,"title":132},{"logo":290,"name":291,"website":292},"2026-11-08T22:59:00Z",50009,"2026-11-05T00:50:10.575Z","data-management-officer-clinical-service-improvement-and-science-dmo-csis-yaound-50009","Data Management Officer – Clinical Service Improvement and Science (DMO-CSIS), Yaoundé",{"slug":180,"title":181},{"_id":394,"category":395,"city":396,"company":397,"deadline":211,"featured":4,"number":399,"publishedAt":400,"salary":279,"slug":401,"title":402,"type":403},"job-legacy-45523",{"icon":92,"slug":93,"title":94},{"slug":158,"title":159},{"name":398},"WCS Wildlife Conservation Society - Cameroun",45523,"2026-11-03T07:32:03.000Z","avis-de-recrutement-chauffeur-vl-45523","Avis de recrutement : Chauffeur VL",{"slug":172,"title":173},{"_id":405,"category":406,"city":407,"company":408,"deadline":211,"featured":4,"number":412,"publishedAt":413,"salary":279,"slug":414,"title":415,"type":416},"job-legacy-45569",{"icon":92,"slug":93,"title":94},{"slug":123,"title":124},{"logo":409,"name":410,"website":411},"https:\u002F\u002Fpub-7a6771395b29454e90953cec49e21f01.r2.dev\u002Flogo\u002Flegacy-e-8043\u002Flegacy-1596708998-cameroun-emplois-offres-recrutement-isa.png","ISA Impact Sante Afrique - ONG Cameroun","https:\u002F\u002Fimpactsante.org\u002F",45569,"2026-11-01T07:32:49.000Z","job-opportunity-regional-project-coordinator-45569","Job opportunity: Regional Project Coordinator",{"slug":172,"title":173},{"items":418,"total":168,"page":340,"pageSize":341},[419,433,443,453,466,478,483],{"_id":420,"category":421,"city":422,"company":423,"deadline":427,"featured":4,"number":428,"publishedAt":429,"salary":279,"slug":430,"title":431,"type":432},"au2og3C4ulRdIC4jSFeB2S",{"icon":112,"slug":113,"title":114},{"slug":127,"title":128},{"logo":424,"name":425,"website":426},"https:\u002F\u002Fpub-7a6771395b29454e90953cec49e21f01.r2.dev\u002Flogo\u002Flegacy-e-21503\u002Flegacy-1771501739-offres-emplois-stages-cameroun-roem.png","ROEM SARL Cameroun","https:\u002F\u002Fcameroun.minajobs.net\u002F","2026-11-06T22:59:59.000Z",50029,"2026-11-05T01:56:01.081Z","03-postes-disponibles-tt-urgent-50029","03 Postes Disponibles - TT URGENT",{"slug":172,"title":173},{"_id":434,"category":435,"city":436,"company":437,"deadline":427,"featured":4,"number":438,"publishedAt":439,"salary":279,"slug":440,"title":441,"type":442},"au2og3C4ulRdIC4jSFe8B8",{"icon":22,"slug":23,"title":24},{"slug":127,"title":128},{"logo":424,"name":425,"website":426},50028,"2026-11-05T01:53:34.657Z","avis-de-recrutement-technico-commercial-h-f-50028","Avis de recrutement : Technico-commercial (H\u002FF)",{"slug":172,"title":173},{"_id":444,"category":445,"city":446,"company":447,"deadline":427,"featured":4,"number":448,"publishedAt":449,"salary":279,"slug":450,"title":451,"type":452},"76jsw0LOflvbGlqukL4AE7",{"icon":112,"slug":113,"title":114},{"slug":127,"title":128},{"logo":424,"name":425,"website":426},50027,"2026-11-05T01:53:32.011Z","avis-de-recrutement-02-stagiaires-professionnels-en-logistique-et-transport-h-f-50027","Avis de recrutement : 02 Stagiaires professionnels en logistique et transport (H\u002FF)",{"slug":188,"title":189},{"_id":454,"category":455,"city":456,"company":457,"deadline":460,"featured":4,"number":461,"publishedAt":462,"salary":211,"slug":463,"title":464,"type":465},"job-50026",{"icon":67,"slug":68,"title":69},{"slug":131,"title":132},{"logo":211,"name":458,"website":459},"CEA - Commission économique des Nations Unies pour l’Afrique","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.uneca.org\u002F","2026-11-06T04:59:59.000Z",50026,"2026-11-05T01:40:32.198Z","economic-affairs-officer-consultant-yaounde-50026","Economic Affairs Officer (Consultant), Yaoundé",{"slug":200,"title":201},{"_id":467,"category":468,"city":469,"company":470,"deadline":472,"featured":4,"number":473,"publishedAt":474,"salary":279,"slug":475,"title":476,"type":477},"hXIPOb7vJnToWfg6FWOZTZ",{"icon":102,"slug":103,"title":104},{"slug":162,"title":163},{"name":471},"SOS Villages d’Enfants Cameroun","2026-11-06T16:00:00.000Z",50025,"2026-11-05T01:39:30.470Z","avis-de-recrutement-charge-e-de-la-securite-security-officer-50025","Avis de recrutement : Chargé(e) de la Sécurité \u002F Security Officer",{"slug":172,"title":173},{"_id":286,"category":479,"city":480,"company":481,"deadline":293,"featured":294,"number":295,"publishedAt":296,"salary":211,"slug":297,"title":298,"type":482},{"icon":92,"slug":93,"title":94},{"slug":131,"title":132},{"logo":290,"name":291,"website":292},{"slug":180,"title":181},{"_id":484,"category":485,"city":486,"company":487,"deadline":488,"featured":4,"number":489,"publishedAt":490,"salary":211,"slug":491,"title":492,"type":493},"job-50024",{"icon":67,"slug":68,"title":69},{"slug":135,"title":136},{"logo":211,"name":354,"website":355},"2026-11-14T22:59:59Z",50024,"2026-11-05T01:20:25.483Z","19-postes-a-pourvoir-dans-13-profils-50024","19 Postes à pourvoir dans 13 profils",{"slug":172,"title":173}]